What Are RAG and KAG? When to Use Which

Artificial intelligence has brought us new ways to connect large language models with external knowledge. One popular approach is Retrieval Augmented Generation, or RAG. Another is Knowledge Augmented Generation, or KAG. Both are useful, but in different ways. Knowing when to use which approach is key to building systems that actually work in practice.

What is RAG?

RAG works by searching through a knowledge base, retrieving the most relevant text, and then letting the model generate an answer from it. This makes it easy to keep systems up to date without retraining the model every time information changes.

RAG is a good fit when you are dealing with unstructured text. Think of FAQs, support manuals, internal company policies, or research papers. It is also fast to set up and flexible to update.

The challenge with RAG is that it sometimes loses coherence. In long documents, it may grab the short definition from the start instead of the richer explanation later on. It also treats each chunk as separate, without knowing how ideas connect.

What is KAG?

KAG can be seen as an alternative approach. Instead of only relying on raw text chunks, it makes use of structured knowledge such as knowledge graphs or databases. These structures show how concepts are linked together.

For example, in a medical setting, a knowledge graph might connect a symptom to possible diseases, and then to potential treatments. In finance, it might connect companies to ownership structures and transactions. With this structure, retrieval does not stop at a single definition, it can bring in connected explanations and examples.

This makes KAG useful when relationships matter and when reasoning across concepts is important.

When to Use RAG vs KAG

RAG is the better choice when:

Your knowledge is mostly unstructured text.
The information changes often.
You want quick answers from sources like FAQs, HR guidelines, or research papers.

KAG is the better choice when:

Your domain relies on clear relationships between entities.
You need reasoning that follows links across concepts.
You are working in areas like healthcare, finance, or recommendations.

RAG and KAG solve different problems. RAG is strong when the goal is to search text and answer quickly. KAG is strong when the goal is to use structure and relationships to deliver deeper answers.

Neither is better in every case. The right choice depends on the kind of knowledge you have and the type of questions you want to answer.

About the author

Nasir Shuvo

Research Assistant

Scroll to Top